October 13, 2020 at 1:54 am #383816Vincit Omnia VeritasKeymaster
Kary B. Mullis won the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his invention of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method to copy and amplify DNA. The PCR technique he invented is now used to test for COVID-19, even though the inventor of the test himself said it was utterly unsuitable for clinical diagnoses. His criticism was notoriously expressed in the context of HIV, as he disputed HIV’s role in AIDS, and was upset at how his PCR technique had been used to shoehorn HIV as the cause of AIDS. His views were summarized in a book Dancing Naked In The Mind Field.
Journalist John Lauritsen writes:
Kary Mullis […] is thoroughly convinced that HIV is not the cause of AIDS. With regard to the viral-load tests, which attempt to use PCR for counting viruses, Mullis has stated: “Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.” PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral-load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.
Kary Mullis also understood the global warming hoax and was open about taking hallucinogenic “drugs” like LSD and admitted he would never have made his inventions without expanding his mind with them. Furthermore, Kary Mullis called Anthony Fauci a fraud.
In 2019, Kary Mullis conveniently died two months before Event 201, which simulated the global pandemic, preceding the roll out of the real scamdemic. The official story is that he died from pneumonia. Given his outspoken views and history, there’s no fucking way he would have just sat quietly idle while the Cabal abuses his test to tread on people’s natural rights, as he knew it could be abused in this way. So he had to die by any means necessary.
A lot of what is called scientific literature is false. The driving force is their careers. Scientists are not beyond the kind of greed and ego that lawyers have.
~ Kary Mullis
David Crowe, a Canadian researcher with a degree in biology and mathematics said about the PCR test:
In one paper, I found 37 cycles. If you didn’t get enough fluorescence by 37 cycles, you are considered negative. In another, paper, the cutoff was 36. Thirty-seven to 40 were considered “indeterminate.” And if you got in that range, then you did more testing. I’ve only seen two papers that described what the limit was. So, it’s quite possible that different hospitals, different States, Canada versus the US, Italy versus France are all using different cutoff sensitivity standards of the Covid test. So, if you cut off at 20, everybody would be negative. If you cut off a 50, you might have everybody positive.
PCR for diagnosis is a big problem. When you have to amplify it these huge numbers of time, it’s going to generate massive amounts of false positives. Again, I’m skeptical that a PCR test is ever true.
Kary Mullis on HIV and AIDS:
October 13, 2020 at 1:44 pm #384019TheProtocolsOfZionParticipant
Now we understand what the global warming propaganda was really all about. Agenda 21.
October 19, 2020 at 10:48 am #386429Lord WankdustParticipant
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.